A systematic approach for the selection of the process involves two parameters.
They are as follows:
4.1 Viability parameters
- This parameter considers the following factors:
- Availability of raw materials
- Availability of utilities
- Safety Health and Environmental aspects of the process
- Simplicity of the process
- Proven track of process licensor
- Valuable intermediates and coproducts
- Scope for backward integration
4.2 Profitability
parameters
They include:
- Gross cost of production
- Project cost
Since the study is done in the pre feasibility level, the process
selection exercise is carried out entirely on the basis of viability
parameters.
4.3 Process Selection
Exercise
In the conventional process for the manufacture of ethylene
carbonate, phosgene is used. Phosgene is a highly toxic and corrosive gas.
Moreover, there are lot of problems in handling it. So considering Safety-
Health –Environmental (SHE) aspects, this process can be neglected.
Manufacture of ethylene carbonate by oxidation of 1,3 dioxolane is not
economically viable, due to low yield of the product. In chlorohydrin route,
along with ethylene carbonate, large quantities of water are generated. Hence
probability of ethylene glycol formation is higher. Ethylene carbonate-ethylene
glycol separation is going to cost. So it is economically unviable. In
transesterification process, undesirable byproducts are formed. So there is an
additional burden on project cost to separate this byproduct, which is anyway
worthless. Olefin halohydrin route seems to be attractive with reasonable
selectivity for ethylene carbonate. But this process has not been commercially
tested. Oxidation of olefin under CO2 atmosphere gives low yield of
ethylene carbonate.
4.4 Conclusion
The industrial process of manufacturing ethylene carbonate from
ethylene oxide and carbon dioxide can be selected because of
- High yield of ethylene carbonate
- Simplicity of the process
4.5 Catalyst Selection
The first catalyst used for the conversion of ethylene oxide and
carbon dioxide was NaOH on activated carbon. This catalyst was short lived
because of poor yields of ethylene carbonate. Also serious explosions may
result if ethylene oxide and NaOH are inadvertently combined in the absence of
CO2. Halogenides from univalent and multivalent metals are also
effective as catalyst. Primary and secondary amines are effective catalysts for
this reaction. They are less suitable because they can react with oxirane to
yield alkanol amine thereby leading to lower efficiency and larger catalyst
requirements (Dunn et.al.1956). Ion exchange resins containing quaternary
ammonium groups such as the resins Amberlite IRA-400 and Amberlite IRA-410 can
be used as catalysts (McClellan 1959). In technical processes in which
conversion and yield are to be as high as possible in a short residence time,
practically tetra ethyl ammonium bromide is used. This compound has the
property of being able to dissolve homogeneously in the initial epoxide and in
the reaction product whereas a few mentioned catalysts do not fulfil this
requirement. So it is selected as a catalyst.
4.6 Solvent Selection
Solvents are primarily used as diluents in this reaction.
These solvents assist in temperature control and permit the handling of
reactants at lower pressure than that are otherwise possible. Dioxane, benzene,
water and ethylene carbonate can be used as a solvent. Usage of dioxane,
benzene and water as solvents is not attractive due to additional burden on
separating them from product. So choosing ethylene carbonate itself as a
solvent can save this downstream separation cost.
No comments:
Post a Comment